Spendenaufruf

Bildungswochenende

Und der Zukunft zugewandt

2a

Freundschaftgesellschaft BRD-Kuba

Netzwerk Cuba

Freiheit für die Cuban 5

Netzwerk Cuba

Aktuelles über Cuba

Freiheit für Sadat

Rote Hilfe

Informationsstelle Militarisierung

Stalinwerke

Red Channel

Deutsche Kommunisten

Jugendbibliothek Gera

Kundschafter des Friedens

Solid Net

Northstarkompas

Global Research

Kommunisten in der Schweiz

Konferenz Prag 2009

Das Präsidium

KONFERENZEN - Konferenz Prag 2009
konferenzpraesidium

Aktualisiert (Mittwoch, den 18. November 2009 um 19:33 Uhr)

 

Marcin Adam (Poland) - The monster of anticommunism and its invisible enemies

KONFERENZEN - Konferenz Prag 2009
m_adam_kp_polenThe communist and workers movement continues the struggle for the future all over the world. It is obviously at a different stage and level in each country and region. In the countries where
communist parties almost don't exist, as well as in the countries where working class is achieving significant successes, where communist and workers' parties are ruling the state -the struggle for
social consciousness is basically everywhere.
In this contribution I would like to focus on those countries where communist parties are substantially weak, discriminated, oppressed and threatened.
However, some conclusions you may also find useful in the countries where our parties are relatively strong and present in the public life because they are also subjected to the pressure of a very special kind.
If we take take an example of Parties who are in the relatively better situation, that have some human and material means, even some parliamentary representation and state donation, their means
are nothing in comparison with the means (especially material, financial means) that are used and spent every year, every month for huge anticommunist campaigns in those countries.
Whereas communist parties in the countries like Poland have been excluded form a public discussion for twenty years, they are lacking basic means for their existence, anticommunism turned into an industry, disposing a whole range of instruments. These are state's and privately owned institutions, that were created almost directly to fight with Communism, like Polish Institute of National Memory, or indirectly, but fully engaged, like schools, mass-media. They employ the army of historians, journalists, experts of public relations, movie creators and others.

Aktualisiert (Mittwoch, den 18. November 2009 um 19:30 Uhr)

Weiterlesen...

 

Hassan Charfo (Czech Republic) - Rightists and social democrats frittered away what Communists had built

KONFERENZEN - Konferenz Prag 2009
At the beginning of the CP of Czechoslovakia regime the total assets of Czechoslovakia amounted to about 400 billion CZK (crowns). Obviously, without the value of the land, of our cultural and historical inheritance (monuments and their equipment) and military arsenal. By the end of 1989 this property or the national assets had increased to roughly 3 trillion CZK, that is, more than 7.5 times (the Czech Republic’s share was 5.8 times, and Slovakia’s 11.4 times), with at the same time a fivefold increase in the level of personal consumption of the population. To this should also be added modern military hardware valued at about 200 billion CZK. (We had, for example, more than 400 combat aircraft) This is all calculated in comparable 1989 prices and after deducting the depreciation of production funds. These values then mirror the actual physical growth and the state of the total national assets. All are real existing in-use structures - buildings, machinery and equipment, not fictitious stock-market bubbles. Of this, public (state and local government) property in 1947 accounted for approximately 55 to 58%, and in 1989 approximately 65 to 70%. The remainder was mostly cooperative and personal property (mostly comprising private homes).

Weiterlesen...

 

Michael Opperskalski (BRD) - 20 Jahre danach – der Kampf für die Zukunft hält an

KONFERENZEN - Konferenz Prag 2009

mo1Liebe Genossinnen und Genossen,
Zunächst einmal möchte ich mich im Namen der marxistisch-leninistischen Zeitschrift „offen-siv“ sowie des „Vorläufigen Organisationskomitees“ der „Kommunistischen Initiative in Deutschland“ (KI), die ich hier beide vertreten darf, für Eure Einladung zu dieser wichtigen theoretisch-ideologischen Konferenz bedanken. Sie trägt den Titel „20 Jahre danach – der Kampf für die Zukunft hält an“ (Twenty Years After – The Fight For The Future Continues).
Was ist der Schlüssel für den Kampf um die Zukunft? Wo liegt er?

1) Gültigkeit des Marxismus-Leninismus bewiesen
Die vergangenen 20 Jahre haben die Gültigkeit des Marxismus-Leninismus in all seinen Aspekten bewiesen. Dies betrifft insbesondere die tatsächlichen Hintergründe der Konterrevolution in den sozialistischen Ländern Ost-Europas, aber auch die Entwicklung der so genannten Neuen Weltordnung, die nichts anderes als ordinärer Imperialismus ist. Die Konterrevolution konnte sich entwickeln und sich zeitweilig durchsetzen, weil ihr der Revisionismus seit dem XX. Parteitag der KPdSU in der kommunistischen Weltbewegung den Weg geebnet hatte.

Aktualisiert (Mittwoch, den 18. November 2009 um 19:31 Uhr)

Weiterlesen...

 

Enid Riemenschneider (Denmark) – Capitalism has reached that point which gives truth to the slogan: Socialism or Barbary!

KONFERENZEN - Konferenz Prag 2009

Dear comrades.

On behalf of Danish Communist Party I am conveying a warm thank you! to the Prague section of the Communist Party of Bohemia-Moravia for inviting us to this event, and discussion.
In a couple of days the rulers of Europe and all the corporate owned mass media will go completely overboard  celebrating the 20th anniversary of the fall of the “Berlin Wall”.
We see it as the temporary set back of Socialism in Europe.
However, these historic events certainly had great impact on the power relations between Capital and the European working class, and – since they were followed by the implosion of the Soviet Union – they had great impact in every corner of the world.
In Europe it fuelled neoliberalism – understood as a set of economic policies and as an ideology – that already was working in the USA, and heavily brought on Great Britain by the Thatcher-regime.
The results were privatisations, deregulations, and budget cuts deteriorating public welfare, free educational systems, health care, you name it – and in the former socialist countries, wild capitalism.
The ideology of neo liberalism is embedded in the old Danish proverb: “I am the smith of my own prosperity”, and in slogans like the old “the money are best kept in the citizens pockets”, and new ones like: “you must be responsibly for your own learning – for your health” – and so on.
I am sure, every country has its own versions of this propaganda.

Weiterlesen...

 

Eloisa Rule (Great Britain ) – To the issue of a severe split of the international communist movement

KONFERENZEN - Konferenz Prag 2009

The international communist movement suffered a severe split in the 1960's as a result of Khrushchevite revisionism – a split that has severely weakened it.  To repair this split, we must examine its causes.

What were the issues which caused the split?

The main issues that caused the split and which must be resolved if the world communist movement is going to be able to reunite as a genuinely proletarian revolutionary force are:
Revision of Marxist economics
The reintroduction by the Khrushchevite revisionist clique and its successors of bourgeois economic norms into the socialist economy of the Soviet Union, so-called 'market socialism', paved the way for the eventual collapse of the Soviet Union, as Cde Stalin had warned in his Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR (1952). The whole point of proletarian revolution is to free humanity of the havoc wreaked on the wellbeing of its overwhelming majority by the operation of the laws of the market, in particular the law of value.  Expanding the scope of the law of value in a socialist society, and thus necessarily undermining the role of central planning, cannot possibly be a method of advancing socialism, unlike what the revisionists claimed. The departure from the basics of Marxism on this point was one step that helped to fracture the international communist movement, as well as to weaken the dictatorship of the proletariat in the Soviet Union and east European People’s Democracies.
‘Peaceful transition to socialism’

Weiterlesen...

 

Eloisa Rule (Great Britain) – "TWENTY YEARS AFTER - THE FIGHT FOR THE FUTURE CONTINUES"

KONFERENZEN - Konferenz Prag 2009
Full text of the contribution of the CPGB-ML to the 27th Prague Theoretic-Political Conference
7. November 2009

The international communist movement suffered a severe split in the 1960's as a result of Khrushchevite revisionism.  The result is that even today, 18 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the communist movement is still divided along the lines of that split into what we might term a pro-Soviet wing on the one hand and a pro-China wing on the other.  While each of the wings is making sporadic efforts to overcome the various splits that have taken place within each of them, the chasm between those who found themselves on different sides of the Soviet/China split seems as yawning as ever.
Our Party has had occasion to comment in the past on revisions of Marxian economic theory, which contributed to the split in the movement and which ended up bringing to its knees the once mighty Soviet Union, allowing the public wealth that had been built up by the enthusiastic sweat and toil of its people to be usurped by a handful of corrupt billionaires.  In his book, Perestroika – the complete collapse of revisionism – our Chairman, Harpal Brar, with a view to facilitating the regrouping of communists following the shameful defeat that the collapse of the Soviet Union represented for the world communist movement, showed how the reintroduction of bourgeois economic norms into the socialist economy of the Soviet Union, so-called 'market socialism', had paved the way for that collapse, as Cde Stalin had warned in his Economic Problems of Socialism in the USSR (1952). The whole point of proletarian revolution is to free humanity of the havoc wreaked on the wellbeing of its overwhelming majority by the operation of the laws of the market, in particular the law of value.  Not only can the toiling masses so long as capitalism subsists not prevent their periodic devastation by the operation of these laws, but even the bourgeoisie is not in control, and many of its number are periodically hurled into the proletariat, never again to emerge.  Those that remain are, in their determination to hold on to and rebuild their wealth, driven to wars which engulf the toiling masses in further suffering to no good effect.  When after the death of Cde Stalin 'market reforms' were introduced in the Soviet Union, ostensibly with a view to increasing production and productivity, the net effect was to extend the sphere of the market, the extent of production for profit, with all its deleterious consequences, into the Soviet economy, which in turn ended up not only reducing the rate of growth but, worse, in alienating the toiling masses.  The market reforms broke the link between the producer and his product, took control out of the hands of the workers placing it instead in the hands of profit-oriented bureaucrats. The tragic result of this is that on the day of the counter-revolution in August 2001, there was virtually nobody available able and willing to defend the socialist gains of the October revolution. Despite all their schooling in the principles of Marxism-Leninism, the people of Soviet Russia and of the People’s Democracies of eastern Europe let their socialist revolution go, believing that the restoration of capitalism would lead to a better life.  The majority of those who were formerly Soviet people and east European people have been plunged into hardship and have found out the hard way how false was their naive belief.

Weiterlesen...

 

Nikos Seretakis (Greece) - The counterrevolutionary overthrows do not change the character of the epoch.

KONFERENZEN - Konferenz Prag 2009
n_seretakis_kkeDear comrades,
On behalf of the CC of KKE Ι would like to thank you for your invitation.
The 18th Congress of KKE, fulfilling the task set forward by the 17th Congress four years ago, dwelled deeper into the causes of the victory of the counterrevolution and of capitalist restoration. This is imperative for the revival of the faith to socialism.
For more than a century now, bourgeois polemics against the communist movement, concentrate their fire on the revolutionary core of the workers’ movement, the Communist Party. This is also the aim of the  anti-communist wave nowadays on the occasion of the fall of the Berlin Wall. They struggle against the necessity of revolution and its political offspring, the dictatorship of the proletariat that is the revolutionary working class power. In particular, they fight against the outcome of the first victorious revolution, of the October Revolution in Russia.
For more than a century now, every current negating, retreating or resigning from the necessity of revolutionary struggle is being promoted as “democratic socialism”, in opposition to the so-called “totalitarian”, “dictatorial”, “putchist” communism. Our party rejects also the notion of  the “Socialism of the 21st Century”, that means a negation of the concrete socialist experience of the past century.
Today, international opportunism has regrouped itself through the “Party of the European Left”, which has stepped up the tone of the “democratic socialism” rhetoric, under the conditions of a synchronous manifestation of the capitalist economic crisis. Their attitude is instructive: In some instances they negate the entire 70-year history of the USSR, in others they specifically aim at the period during which its socialist foundation was erected as well as at I.V. Stalin personally. Whatever the case, they always support those political practices that constituted deviations from the socialist course.

Aktualisiert (Mittwoch, den 18. November 2009 um 19:32 Uhr)

Weiterlesen...

 

Gyula Thürmer (Hungary) - Twenty Years of Hungarian Capitalism and The Revolutionary Perspective In Hungary

KONFERENZEN - Konferenz Prag 2009

Contribution by Dr. Gyula THÜRMER, president of the Hungarian Communist Workers’ Party

The forces of capitalism both in Europe and Hungary make enormous efforts to hidden the fact that the contemporary capitalism is in a deep crisis. They cannot deny the existence of serious problems of capitalism but try to demonstrate that all problems can be solved in the frameworks of capitalism by capitalist reforms. But the truth is that the serious internal crisis of capitalism cannot be solved by the traditional capitalist reforms. The revolutionary perspective of solving the problems of capitalism is getting more and more reality.

The Crisis Of Hungarian Capitalism

The Hungarian capitalism is in crisis and the general crisis of international capitalism makes it even deeper. The crisis of contemporary Hungarian capitalism can be explained by the following factors:

Aktualisiert (Mittwoch, den 18. November 2009 um 19:05 Uhr)

Weiterlesen...

 

Antikrieg_endversion

Die KI-Aufkleber könnt ihr unter kontakt@kommunistische-initiative.deDiese E-Mail-Adresse ist gegen Spambots geschützt! JavaScript muss aktiviert werden, damit sie angezeigt werden kann. bestellen!


mitglied_werden_klein

KI-NRW

KI-Sachsen

Offensiv

Geheim Magazin

Einheit

Die Wahrheit

KInfo

Offensiv Kanal

Aktuelle Nachrichten

Bildung

Der schwarze Kanal

KI auf Facebook

KI auf Twitter

KI-NRW auf Facebook

Castor_Anzeigen_Nov2010_105x160_grau._klein